There are songs from the 1990s that come back carrying too much luggage. Some return wrapped in flannel, some in the glow of MTV, some with the faint smell of a plastic CD case that has been sitting in a drawer since Clinton was in office. Joan Osborne’s “One of Us” comes back differently. I remember it less as a period object than as an interruption: a song that wandered into mainstream radio in 1995, asked an embarrassingly large question in plain clothes, and then refused to tidy the answer up for us.
At the time, the hook did most of the work. It was catchy, strange, slightly provocative and almost impossible not to remember. Thirty years later, the thing that stays with me is not the cleverness of the premise but its lack of spectacle. The song imagines divinity not descending through thunderclouds or stained glass, but reduced to human scale: tired, solitary, commuting, easy to overlook. The famous image of the “stranger on the bus” is what gives the whole idea its teeth, because the song does not really ask whether God could look ordinary. It asks whether we would notice anything sacred once the branding disappeared.
That lands differently now. When you are younger, ordinariness can feel like something to escape; later, you realise it is where most of life actually happens. The supermarket queue, the clinic waiting room, the commute, the desk, the lift, the half-finished conversation you keep meaning to return to. “One of Us” has aged well because it was never really chasing youth. It was chasing recognition, and recognition tends to get more complicated as you get older.
Before the Hit Became the Filing Cabinet
The odd thing about “One of Us” becoming Joan Osborne’s defining song is that it does not tell the whole story of Joan Osborne particularly well. She had already spent time in New York’s downtown music scene, working clubs and developing a voice with far more blues, soul and bar-room grain than the tidy label of “new artist” suggests. Her 1995 debut album Relish, released on Blue Gorilla/Mercury and produced by Rick Chertoff, was never simply a delivery system for one single. It moved through folk, rock, blues and soul with the sort of stylistic looseness that feels very mid-90s now: before playlists encouraged every artist to stay inside one extremely searchable box.
The record was noticed as a record, too. Relish received an Album of the Year Grammy nomination, Osborne was nominated for Best New Artist, and “One of Us” received nominations including Record of the Year, Song of the Year and Best Female Pop Vocal Performance. The single reached No. 4 on the Billboard Hot 100 and went on to top charts in several other countries. Those are large numbers, but they also explain the problem that followed. A hit that big can become less a doorway into an artist’s work than a filing cabinet that gets locked around it.
Pop culture likes efficient labels. “One-hit wonder” is especially efficient because it makes an entire working life sound like a statistical accident. Osborne kept recording, touring, moving through soul, blues, roots music and interpretive projects long after the radio moment passed. Her own biography makes that continuation fairly plain, and the fact that Relish received a 30th-anniversary reissue in 2026 says something about the record’s longer life. The market may have remembered one song most loudly, but the artist did not stop when the chart did.
The Song That Almost Belonged to Somebody Else
“One of Us” was written by Eric Bazilian of the Hooters, not by Osborne, and its creation has the kind of accidental quality that people later like to polish into mythology. Bazilian has described writing it quickly during the Relish sessions, with producer Rick Chertoff recognising something in the demo and pushing for Osborne to record it. In a 2024 oral history for The Guardian, Bazilian and Osborne recalled that the song was even considered for the Crash Test Dummies before Chertoff insisted it belonged with Osborne. It is easy to imagine that alternate universe: the same premise delivered in Brad Roberts’ basement-deep baritone, probably drier and stranger, but also colder.
Osborne’s version works because she does not treat the lyric like a philosophical stunt. Her voice is too textured for that. She sounds grounded, a little frayed around the edges, curious without being wide-eyed, and sceptical without hiding behind irony. A cleaner singer might have made the song pious; a more theatrical singer might have turned it into a monologue. Osborne makes the question sound lived-in. That distinction is small on paper and enormous when you hear it.
The lyric also caused exactly the sort of trouble a song about God on ordinary public transport was probably destined to cause. Osborne has spoken about religious backlash, protests and even death threats, while insisting that the song was not simply mocking belief. That makes sense to me. Its provocation is not that it sneers at faith, but that it removes distance. For some people, distance is part of reverence; for others, intimacy is the point. “One of Us” presses on that difference without pretending it can settle it.
The Question Is More Interesting Than the Answer
A lot of pop songs are built around declarations. “One of Us” is built around a hypothetical, which is one reason it has survived repeated radio play, parody, television use and the general wear-and-tear of becoming a 1990s standard. It does not provide doctrine, and it does not really offer consolation. Instead it asks what would happen if the divine entered ordinary human conditions without status, lighting or special effects.
This is where the designer part of my brain gets interested. Remove the halo, the robes, the institutional identity system and the centuries of visual shorthand. Take away the logo, in other words. What remains, and would we recognise it? We miss ordinary people all the time precisely because they look ordinary. The commuter standing beside us, the tired person behind the counter, the stranger who is moving too slowly when we are in a hurry: none of them arrive with a visual cue telling us to pay attention.
The bus is therefore a better image than it first appears. Public transport is democratic in the least glamorous way possible. Everyone is reduced to a body trying to get somewhere, usually under unflattering light, close to strangers without necessarily knowing anything about them. Putting God there is almost funny, but it also turns the song into an ethical test. The question stops being “Would I believe?” and becomes “Would I behave differently if I suspected the ordinary person beside me mattered more than I assumed?” You do not need to be religious for that question to remain uncomfortable.
Old Tape, Mid-90s Radio and a Voice from Somewhere Else
The album version begins with an older field-recording atmosphere before the 1990s production arrives. The voice belongs to Nell Hampton singing “The Airplane Ride”, a spiritual later issued on New World Records’ The Gospel Ship; its use on “One of Us” was licensed from the Alan Lomax archive. That opening matters more to me now than it did when I first heard the track. It gives the record a sense of transmission, as though the modern song is not beginning from scratch but tuning itself to a frequency that was already there.
Then the band comes in and everything shrinks back to human scale. Rick Chertoff’s production does not try to simulate holiness with a choir, a wall of strings or cathedral-sized reverb. The arrangement circles rather than ascends. The guitars have a loose, earthy pull; the rhythm feels closer to walking than marching; Osborne’s vocal sits inside the track instead of floating above it. That restraint is essential. A bigger arrangement might have crushed the premise under its own importance.
There is something very 1995 about the confidence to leave that much awkwardness intact. The song has a hook, certainly, but it is not streamlined. It contains an old spiritual fragment, a blunt metaphysical question, a slightly peculiar vocal and a chorus that does not attempt to resolve anything. It sounds like a hit that nobody had yet run through the software designed to make a hit behave properly.
Coney Island Was the Right Place to Put God
The music video, directed by Mark Seliger and Fred Woodward, was shot largely around Coney Island, intercutting Osborne’s performance with amusement rides, crowds and images given an old, sepia-stained texture. It is difficult to think of a better setting for the song. Coney Island is spectacle with the rust still showing: a place of machinery, public pleasure, tired paint, bright lights, ordinary bodies and the faint melancholy that clings to attractions built to manufacture wonder on schedule.
That mixture suits the song because the video never tries to visualise God. It visualises people moving through public space. The sacred, if it is there at all, remains off-camera and unresolved. The Wonder Wheel, roller coasters and boardwalk crowds provide the grandeur, but it is human-scale grandeur, built from bolts, bulbs and queue lines rather than clouds parting above Manhattan.
The Mid-90s Had Room for Weird Sincerity
It helps to remember what mainstream music could still look like in the middle of the 1990s. Alternative rock had stopped being alternative in any useful commercial sense, but radio had not yet become quite as hermetically formatted as it would later feel. Alanis Morissette could sound furious and conversational, R.E.M. could still make wounded cosmic uncertainty commercially viable, and singer-songwriters could arrive with rough edges intact. There was a brief window in which earnestness and irony were not yet required to choose separate tables.
“One of Us” fit that window because it risked embarrassment. That is more significant than it sounds. A song this direct could easily have become either a novelty or a sermon, yet it sits uneasily between the two, which is exactly where its life is. I suspect it would be harder for a song with the same premise to breathe for long now before being clipped, memed, theologised, corrected, defended and converted into opposing content streams. Perhaps every generation thinks the next one misunderstands things more quickly, but there was something useful about a song having time to become familiar before it became an argument.
The irony is that “One of Us” was already an argument in 1995. The difference is that you mostly encountered the argument through the whole song. You heard the verses, the old recording at the front, the slightly ungainly guitar texture and Osborne’s delivery before deciding what offended or moved you. Context was built into the four or five minutes. That now feels almost luxurious.
Prince Heard the Same Question
Prince covering “One of Us” on Emancipation in 1996 makes more sense to me now than it did when I first learned he had done it. He spent much of his career collapsing the supposed distance between flesh and spirit, desire and faith, the earthly and the divine. A song that imagines God inside ordinary embodiment sits comfortably inside that long-running tension, even if his interpretation naturally gives the idea a different charge.
That cover is also a useful reminder that a durable song can survive another artist’s body. Prince draws out its cosmic possibilities; Osborne keeps it on the pavement. Her version remains the one I return to because the whole premise depends on plainness. It needs the sense that this enormous question has appeared in the middle of an ordinary day, without warning and without a lighting rig.
The “One-Hit Wonder” Problem
The bigger a song becomes, the easier it is for the public to use it as a substitute for the artist. “One-hit wonder” sounds affectionate enough, but it is a strange way to describe a person who continues working for decades. It measures cultural memory rather than artistic activity, then quietly pretends the two are the same thing. Osborne’s career is an obvious example of why that shorthand fails: she has kept recording, interpreting other writers, touring and moving between genres while “One of Us” remained the doorway most people still recognised.
There is a slightly cruel mechanism in this. The more successful the song, the narrower the introduction becomes. An artist can spend thirty years adding rooms to the house while the public keeps standing in the doorway asking about the first one. Osborne seems to have made peace with that relationship, and perhaps there are worse ghosts to live with. If one song is going to follow you for the rest of your life, at least this one still contains a question worth carrying.
What I Hear Now That I Did Not Hear Then
When the song was new, I mostly heard the audacity of the premise. God on a bus: there was the hook, the conversation starter, the thing that made you turn the radio up. I hear something else now. I hear loneliness. The divine figure imagined by the song is not surrounded by worshippers or carried through the world by certainty. He is unrecognised, moving through ordinary space, subject to the same dull separations and inconveniences as everyone else.
Age does that to songs. Details that once looked like scenery move to the foreground, while the part you thought was the point becomes only one part of it. The idea of God being ordinary feels less provocative to me now than the idea of God being lonely. To become human in the song is not merely to take on a face; it is to accept waiting, embarrassment, boredom, hunger, missed calls, bad timing and the humiliating fact that none of us gets through life without needing someone else.
That is probably why the song feels less like a theological puzzle to me these days and more like a song about attention. Most of adult life is not made of revelations. It is made of noticing, or failing to notice, the people and things directly in front of us. Careers lose their glamour, institutions lose their polish, heroes become complicated, and eventually you learn to look for meaning without the production design. “One of Us” was doing that from the beginning. I simply needed a few more decades to hear it.
After the Static Cleared
“One of Us” could easily have become a novelty, a sermon or a smug thought experiment that aged badly once the radio stopped playing it every hour. Instead, Osborne’s performance turned it into something stranger and more durable. It remains a pop song about belief, certainly, but also about status, recognition and the possibility that we are too easily impressed by spectacle and too easily bored by ordinary human presence.
The song never tells us what to believe, which may be its smartest decision. It asks us to imagine a world in which divinity carries no obvious authority, then leaves us to deal with what that would expose about the way we look at everyone else. The question survives whether you are devout, doubtful, lapsed, uninterested or simply old enough to have heard the song when it was new and then rediscovered it after the cultural static cleared.
I used to think the provocative part was putting God on the bus. Now I think the provocative part is the possibility that we would sit beside him, complain about the journey, stare at our own reflection in the window and never look sideways. That is a quieter idea than the song seemed to contain in 1995, and a better one. It is also why, after all this time, “One of Us” still does not feel entirely like nostalgia.
Sources and Further Reading
For the production history and the song’s unlikely path into the Relish sessions, see The Guardian’s 2024 oral history. Osborne’s official biography provides useful context for the career beyond the hit, while the Recording Academy’s 1996 awards archive documents the Grammy nominations. The official 30th-anniversary Relish reissue page is also a useful reminder that the album has had a longer afterlife than the one-hit-wonder label suggests.
Image-rights note: The suggested photographs above are Creative Commons files and can be reused if the stated attribution and licence conditions are followed. I have deliberately not inserted the Relish or “One of Us” cover art as a recommended downloadable image because those designs remain copyrighted promotional artwork rather than openly licensed media.
Affiliate Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. If you click through and make a purchase, I may earn a small commission—at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products I personally find useful or relevant. Thank you for your support.
Leave a Reply