There is a particular feeling that comes with starting a film and slowly realizing, somewhere between the first corpse, the first hallway, or the first unfortunate person making a plainly terrible decision, that you may have seen this before.
Not in the vague “all horror movies are the same” way. I mean the slightly embarrassing, middle-aged streaming-era version of déjà vu. The kind where a scene arrives and some tired part of your brain raises its hand from the back of the room and says, “Wait. Haven’t we done this already?”
That was my experience with Urban Myths, the 2022 South Korean horror anthology also known as Seoul Goedam or Seoul Ghost Stories. I started watching it with the usual expectation I bring to Korean horror: maybe something sharp, maybe something atmospheric, maybe a few ghosts with hair doing overtime in the shadows. Then, as the stories began piling up, I had the creeping suspicion that I had seen this film before and had simply misplaced it somewhere in the overstuffed filing cabinet of my horror-watching memory. And honestly, I did not mind.
There are films you rewatch because you love them. There are films you rewatch because they changed you. Then there are films you accidentally rewatch because streaming has turned our viewing habits into a foggy warehouse of thumbnails, half-remembered trailers, regional alternate titles, and “I think I saw this on Netflix once” confusion. Urban Myths belongs to that last category for me. It is not a masterpiece. It is not a film that rearranged my idea of horror. But it is also not a wasted second viewing, if that is what this was.
It has the shape of a remembered nightmare. Not one big nightmare, but ten smaller ones. Some better than others. Some too thin. Some nasty enough to leave a small stain. Some almost gone from memory before the next one begins. But the film understands something about urban legends that a lot of more polished horror misses: these stories are not always supposed to be fully satisfying. They are supposed to feel like something overheard, forwarded, exaggerated, and passed along by someone who swears it happened to a friend of a cousin’s classmate. That is both the film’s strength and its limitation.
A Film Built Like a Folder of Haunted Attachments
Urban Myths is an anthology of ten horror shorts, each centered on a familiar fear tucked into everyday urban life: tunnels, apartments, secondhand furniture, dental pain, mirrors, mannequins, escape rooms, job interviews, social media, and the strange noises that come from the other side of a wall.
Released in South Korea on 27 April 2022, the film was directed by Hong Won-ki, who had already directed roughly 1,500 music videos, commercials and related projects. That background is useful to understanding the film. This does not feel like a feature made by someone obsessed with long-form classical horror structure. It feels like a series of high-impact visual setups, each designed to get in, establish a mood, hit a visual hook, and get out. That gives the movie its energy, but it also explains why some segments feel more like concepts than stories.
There is no wraparound narrative here. No old storyteller. No cursed book. No group of teenagers sitting in a van trading legends before the final reveal. The film simply moves from one tale to the next, almost like a playlist. That suits it. A wraparound would probably have made it heavier and not necessarily better. The film already has enough connective tissue in its recurring obsession with modern urban fear. It does not need a professor of folklore explaining why the mirror is bad news. We know the mirror is bad news. It is a horror anthology. The mirror was never going to offer helpful skincare advice.
The structure also makes it feel closer to the logic of internet horror than traditional feature filmmaking. Each story has the compact rhythm of something you might read online late at night, when you tell yourself you will read just one more creepy thread and then somehow it is 2:17 in the morning and the refrigerator has become suspicious.
This is not slow-burn horror. It is more like packet horror. Ten quick transmissions. Some clear. Some garbled. Some too obvious. Some surprisingly effective.
The K-Horror Texture: Everyday Spaces, Slightly Wrong
What I like about Korean horror, especially in its urban mode, is how often it finds dread in ordinary architecture. The horror is not always in castles, forests, cursed villages, or abandoned mansions. It is in apartments, schools, elevators, karaoke rooms, clinics, side streets, storage spaces, office interviews, and cramped rooms where someone can hear you but cannot quite help you.
Urban Myths leans hard into that. The city becomes less a place than a pressure system. People live too close together. They hear each other through walls. They buy objects from strangers. They perform versions of themselves online. They enter tunnels, rooms, clinics, and jobs believing the rules are stable. Then the rules bend.
A lot of the film’s horror comes from thresholds. A tunnel entrance. A closet door. A mirror surface. A wall between apartments. A dental chair. A job interview room. An escape room door. These are ordinary boundaries until they are not. The film keeps asking the same simple question in different ways: what happens when the thing meant to separate safe from unsafe stops doing its job?
That question is more interesting than the film’s actual scares, which can be familiar. Long-haired ghosts appear. Reflections misbehave. Dead friends should not be summoned. Mannequins are, as always, up to something. But the film’s better moments are not about originality. They are about placement. It puts old fears into current spaces.
It is horror as apartment living. Horror as online bargain hunting. Horror as influencer vanity. Horror as corporate desperation. Horror as the bad acoustics of modern life.
“Tunnel”: Guilt in the Windshield
The opening segment, “Tunnel,” is almost too straightforward, but it does what an opening short needs to do. Gi-hoon is driving at night after a fishing trip, and soon there are handprints on his windshield. He tries to clean them off, but the detail that they wipe away from the inside tells us what kind of trouble we are in.
This is a guilt story. Not an especially complicated one, but an efficient one. Gi-hoon is not presented as a man we need to understand deeply. He is a guilty figure trapped in a moving box, headed toward the exact space where horror films love to remove the possibility of escape: a tunnel.
The windshield is the best part of the segment because it turns the car into a confession booth. He can see out, but something has already entered. The boundary has been broken. That little practical detail is more unnerving than any big apparition could be, because it tells us the haunting is not outside chasing him. It is already inside the vehicle, sitting with him, riding shotgun without asking.
As a first entry, “Tunnel” is more appetizer than meal. It sets the tone: sin, denial, enclosed space, supernatural correction. It also signals the film’s basic moral universe. People do bad things, ignore warning signs, and then the story closes around them like a fist.
“The Woman in Red”: Bullying, Shame, and a Ghost Who Dresses for the Occasion
“The Woman in Red” is one of the more emotionally legible stories in the film. Soo-jin attends the funeral of Hyun-ju, a girl she used to bully, and learns that Hyun-ju died by suicide. Afterward, Soo-jin begins seeing a woman in red.
This is familiar ghost-story territory, but it works because guilt has a way of making even familiar horror feel pointed. Soo-jin is not just being haunted by a random dead girl. She is being followed by the consequence of something she helped create. The red figure becomes less a monster than an accusation.
There is an old-school quality to this segment. It is built on the horror of return: the person you harmed refuses to stay politely dead. This is where Korean horror’s interest in social pressure and emotional debt comes into play. Bullying is not treated as background behavior. It becomes the engine of haunting. The living person wants closure. The dead person wants recognition.
Does the segment surprise? Not really. But it has a clean shape, and in an anthology that sometimes sacrifices depth for speed, that counts. Soo-jin’s fear is easy to understand because it comes from something human before it becomes supernatural. Shame, when cornered, can look a lot like a ghost.
“Tooth Worms”: Body Horror with a Dental Appointment
“Tooth Worms” is probably one of the easiest segments to remember because dental horror has an unfair advantage. The mouth is already a vulnerable place. Add worms and you have a small public health crisis inside someone’s face.
Lee Ho-won plays Choong-jae, the dentist who encounters a patient with severe tooth pain. At first, the problem seems invisible, or at least medically unclear. Then the story starts revealing something much more disgusting and folkloric. The segment moves from clinical uncertainty to full body horror, and the best thing about it is the way it exploits the clean, professional surface of the dental office.
Dentists, like horror directors, ask you to sit still while they put tools near your mouth. There is already a strange contract of trust there. You open yourself up, literally, and hope the person in charge knows what they are doing. “Tooth Worms” contaminates that trust.
The segment is not subtle, and it does eventually tip toward a more frantic mode. But the image of something living where decay should be is effective. It also feels like the kind of old urban legend that survives because it attacks a universal anxiety: what if the body is not closed? What if something is nesting in you and the people with degrees cannot identify it in time?
This is the segment where the film seems most willing to be gross for the old-fashioned pleasure of being gross. I respect that. Horror does not always have to sit in the corner looking tasteful.
“Necromancy”: Teenage Promises and the Stupidity of Grief
“Necromancy” has one of the strongest emotional premises in the film. Ji-hyeon and Hye-yeon are best friends, the kind of teenage friends who make intense promises because at that age everything feels permanent, including feelings that will probably last four days. One of those promises involves bringing the other back if one of them dies.
Then Hye-yeon dies, and grief does what grief often does in horror: it makes a terrible idea feel like devotion. The strength of this segment lies in its understanding of adolescent intimacy. Teen friendships can be dramatic, private, ritualistic, and absolute. They can turn ordinary notebooks, messages, promises, and shared secrets into sacred objects. The horror here is not only that Ji-hyeon tries to bring Hye-yeon back. It is that she cannot accept the adult fact that some promises should be broken.
This is where Urban Myths brushes against a more painful kind of horror. The supernatural event is frightening, but the human impulse underneath it is sad. Anyone who has lost someone knows the ugly bargaining instinct. Just one more conversation. Just one more message. Just one more chance to say the thing properly. Horror takes that private wish and makes it literal, which is usually when everything goes wrong.
“Necromancy” could have worked as a longer film. There is enough there: grief, friendship, school life, guilt, ritual, possession, the cruelty of bringing back something incomplete. In this anthology format, it becomes a concentrated version of a bigger tragedy. Maybe too concentrated. But the idea sticks.
“The Wall”: Apartment Living as a Bad Decision Machine
“The Wall” is one of the most distinctly urban segments, because it is built around noise between living spaces. Anyone who has lived in an apartment knows the strange intimacy of shared walls. You may not know your neighbors, but you know their chairs, their footsteps, their arguments, their plumbing, their late-night habits, and sometimes their taste in music, whether you asked or not.
A young man moves into a new apartment and hears knocking from the neighbour at night. He later encounters a woman who seems to live next door. Instead of doing the sensible horror-movie thing, which is to mind his business and maybe invest in earplugs, he communicates through the wall.
This is where the story becomes both creepy and mildly ridiculous, in the way urban legends often are. The wall is supposed to separate lives, but it becomes a flirtation device, then a trap. The character’s loneliness and curiosity become the opening. The horror does not have to force its way in. He taps back.
I liked the idea more than the execution, but the idea is strong. In dense cities, privacy is always partly fictional. We pretend walls are solid boundaries, but they are often just thin agreements. “The Wall” turns that into a supernatural warning: do not answer every signal. Some signals are bait.
“The Closet”: Secondhand Furniture and the Economy of Bad Omens
“The Closet” taps into a very practical fear: bringing someone else’s object into your home.
A young woman finds a nice secondhand closet through an online flea market. The seller is unsettling, but the furniture is good, and this is how evil wins in real life too. It offers a bargain. It fits the room. It looks expensive. You ignore the strange man because the dimensions are right.
The segment understands how objects carry stories. Secondhand furniture is never just wood, hinges, and varnish. It has absorbed rooms, owners, dust, smells, arguments, sleep, illness, and whatever else happened near it. Most of the time that is harmless. Sometimes, in horror, the object arrives with terms and conditions nobody bothered to disclose.
“The Closet” is not one of the film’s most surprising segments, but it is one of its most archetypal. The home is invaded through taste. Ji-hye wants something that improves her space, and instead she imports a nightmare. There is a quiet class anxiety there too. People take chances on cheap or free things because life is expensive. Horror has always loved that gap between desire and affordability.
And as a viewer, I understand her. A good piece of furniture at a good price can make you overlook a lot. That is probably how at least half of all cursed objects enter circulation.
“Ghost Marriage”: Job Hunting, Corporate Horror, and the Worst Interview Question
“Ghost Marriage” hit me in a different place than the others, maybe because job interviews are already supernatural rituals in their own miserable way.
Jae-hoon is a desperate job seeker who gets a chance at an interview. The interview questions are strange, personal, and increasingly disconnected from the actual job. Soon he learns there may be occult reasons behind the company’s interest in him, involving the CEO, a shaman, and a dead daughter.
This segment could almost be played as black comedy if it were pushed slightly differently. The job market is already full of absurd rites: the rehearsed answers, the fake enthusiasm, the unspoken desperation, the power imbalance of needing to impress someone who may have already decided your fate before you sat down. “Ghost Marriage” simply makes the ritual literal.
Jae-hoon is not just being evaluated for employment; he is being selected for use. That is a nastier idea than the segment fully explores, but it lands. The horror is not only supernatural. It is economic. A desperate person will walk into rooms they should avoid. They will answer questions that feel invasive. They will stay seated longer than they should because maybe, just maybe, this is the break.
The film’s anthology format means we do not get enough time to sit with Jae-hoon’s desperation, but the premise is sharp. It is one of the stories that feels most expandable. A full-length version could turn into a bleak little corporate occult thriller. Human Resources, but with ancestral rites. Which, depending on the office, may not be a huge leap.
“The Girl in the Mirror”: Vanity, Influence, and the Face Looking Back
“The Girl in the Mirror” is one of the film’s most contemporary segments, because its monster is tied to image-making. Its protagonist is an influencer obsessed with appearance, attention, and comparison. Then her reflection starts speaking to her.
Mirror horror is old. Social media horror is newer, though by now it is already developing its own clichés. What makes this segment work is the way the two naturally fit together. The mirror was the original front-facing camera. Social media just gave it distribution, metrics, and an audience that can leave comments.
She is shallow, yes, but the segment is not only scolding her for vanity. It is looking at the way self-image becomes unstable when it is constantly performed. The reflection becomes a rival, a judge, a double, maybe a truer version of the self, maybe a punishment. The horror is not that she sees herself. The horror is that the self looking back may know exactly what she is.
I would have liked more bite here. There is a bigger satire inside this premise, especially in a culture of beauty filters, follower counts, and monetized insecurity. Still, the segment has a clean symbolic hook. It understands that the modern mirror does not just reflect. It evaluates, and that is worse.
“A Mannequin”: The Best Use of the Uncanny
“A Mannequin” is one of the stronger entries because mannequins are inherently horrible. I do not mean that as criticism of retail display design. I mean it as a basic human truth. Anything human-shaped but not human is already halfway to being a threat. It only needs lighting.
Jong-chan works in a mannequin warehouse and hears rumors that some of the mannequins may be more than they seem. This is the kind of setup that does not require much explanation. A warehouse full of blank bodies is already a horror location. The film just has to make us wait for one of them to move.
The segment works because it uses the uncanny well. Mannequins are about imitation without life. Horror reverses that. The imitation gains life, but not in a way that comforts anyone. There is also something quietly brutal about the workplace setting. Jong-chan is surrounded by bodies designed to be dressed, moved, stored, rented, and arranged. Then one of those bodies stops behaving like inventory.
Of all the segments, this may be the one that best suits Hong Won-ki’s visual instincts. It is graphic, clean, and immediately readable. You do not need much backstory. The image does the work. A figure that should not move moves. A face that should not respond responds. A warehouse becomes a trap. Sometimes horror is that simple, and simple is enough.
“Escape Games”: Influencer Fun, Satanic Branding, and the Trap You Paid For
The final segment, “Escape Games,” follows three friends who enjoy escape rooms and respond to an invitation to try a newly opened one. The premise is familiar, but effective: people voluntarily enter a controlled environment designed to simulate danger, only to discover the danger is not simulated.
There is something very modern about paying for fear as entertainment and then being offended when fear does not respect the waiver. Escape rooms, haunted houses, immersive horror events, extreme challenges — all of them rely on the idea that terror can be packaged safely. “Escape Games” pokes at that assumption. The room has one clue, no time limit, and rules that feel wrong almost immediately.
The segment also connects to the film’s interest in performance. These characters are not just playing. They are participating in a culture where experiences become content, and danger becomes a backdrop. Like “The Girl in the Mirror,” it suggests that the desire to be seen can make people careless. The trap is not only the room. It is the promise of a story worth posting.
As a closing segment, it has the advantage of escalation. Escape-room horror naturally creates momentum because the characters must solve, move, panic, and turn on each other. It gives the film a more active finish after several stories built around hauntings and apparitions. Is it original? Not especially. But it is watchable, and in an anthology, watchable counts for a lot.
The K-Pop Factor: Familiar Faces in Unfamiliar Trouble
One of the film’s selling points was its cast, which mixes actors with K-pop idols and performers. Depending on the viewer, this can be either a draw or a distraction. If you follow the groups, part of the fun is seeing familiar performers placed into horror scenarios. If you do not, the casting still gives the film a polished, photogenic quality, but some performances can feel more like strong visual presence than fully lived-in characterization.
That is not entirely the actors’ fault. Ten stories in just over two hours means nobody gets much space. These are not long character studies. They are horror sketches with enough personality to get the premise moving. The actors are asked to establish a type quickly: guilty driver, cruel bully, rational dentist, grieving friend, lonely neighbor, bargain hunter, desperate applicant, shallow influencer, warehouse worker, escape-room thrill-seeker.
In that sense, the film uses character more like iconography. Each person is a figure moving through a specific urban fear. They do not always feel psychologically deep, but they are usually clear. In short-form horror, clarity often matters more than complexity.
The downside is that some deaths or punishments feel mechanical. The film sometimes behaves like a moral vending machine: insert wrongdoing, receive ghost. But the better segments complicate that slightly. “Necromancy” is driven by grief, not wickedness. “Ghost Marriage” is driven by desperation. “The Closet” is driven by practical desire. Those are more interesting because they suggest that horror is not only punishment for sin. Sometimes it is what happens when normal human needs encounter something ancient, hungry, or simply bored.
Why It Feels Familiar, Even If You Forgot It
Part of why I felt I had seen Urban Myths before may be simple: maybe I had. But part of it is built into the material. Urban legends are supposed to feel familiar. They survive because they seem like they have always been around, mutating from place to place.
The haunted tunnel. The vengeful dead girl. The cursed object. The bad ritual. The neighbor through the wall. The mirror double. The mannequin that moves. The game that is not a game. None of these ideas are new, and the film does not pretend otherwise. Instead, it updates them with Korean urban settings and contemporary anxieties.
That creates a strange viewing experience. You may not remember the exact segment, but you remember the shape of it. Your brain recognizes the folklore pattern before the plot arrives. That can make the film feel predictable, but it also gives it the texture of actual urban myth. These stories are not designed to be owned by one film. They are designed to circulate.
This is why I did not resent watching it again. The film itself feels like something repeated. Retold. Rediscovered. Half-forgotten. There is something appropriate about encountering it twice and not being entirely sure. It behaves like the kind of story someone insists you have already heard.
Where the Film Lands
The film works best when the premise is visually immediate and emotionally simple. “Tooth Worms” has body horror. “A Mannequin” has the uncanny. “Ghost Marriage” has a surprisingly nasty social idea. “Necromancy” has grief. “The Wall” has urban loneliness. “The Girl in the Mirror” has image anxiety. These segments do not all land equally, but they all have hooks.
Hong Won-ki’s music video background shows in the film’s clean visual construction. The images are often stronger than the storytelling. That can be frustrating if you want narrative richness, but it also gives the anthology a certain slickness. The film rarely looks careless. It may feel thin, but it does not feel sloppy.
The pace is also generally manageable. Ten stories in just over two hours sounds like too much, and sometimes it is. But the constant reset keeps the film moving. If one story does not work, another is already waiting. Anthologies have that built-in forgiveness. They are like buffets. You forgive the dry dumpling because the next tray might be better.
Where It Thins Out
The main weakness is narrative thinness. Some stories feel as if they stop just as they are becoming interesting. Others rely too heavily on the final scare or moral twist. The film often gives us the premise, the punishment, and the image, but not always the ache underneath.
That is especially noticeable because some concepts deserve more. “Ghost Marriage” could have been a full film. So could “Necromancy.” “A Mannequin” could stretch into a grimy little workplace horror feature. “The Girl in the Mirror” could become a sharper critique of beauty culture and influencer self-destruction. But Urban Myths keeps moving. It does not sit long enough for the bruises to darken.
The scares are also uneven. Some are effective. Some are expected. Some feel like they belong to a familiar vocabulary of Asian horror: hair, pale faces, sudden appearances, unnatural movement, the dead refusing to observe basic boundaries. I have affection for that vocabulary, but familiarity dulls the edge.
Still, I do not think the film fails because it is familiar. It only falters when it mistakes familiarity for completion. A known legend still needs timing, mood, and a little emotional pressure. Some segments have that. Some just have the shape.
The Pleasure of a Modest Rewatch
I keep coming back to the fact that I may have seen this before. That should probably count against the film, but in this case it does not entirely. There are films that evaporate because they have nothing. Urban Myths evaporates partly because it is made of small vapors by design. It is a collection of quick chills, urban anxieties, moral reversals, and creepy images.
Watching it again, or maybe watching it for what only felt like the second time, I found myself less concerned with whether it scared me and more interested in how it functioned. It works like a folder of ghost stories passed from one device to another. Some files are corrupted. Some are sharp. Some have names you recognize. Some you open and immediately remember why you forgot them.
That is not necessarily a bad thing. Not every horror film needs to be a grand descent. Some are just little doors. You open one, look inside, make a face, and move on to the next. Urban Myths is full of those doors.
Familiar Ghosts, Decent Company
Urban Myths is not the strongest Korean horror anthology I have seen, but it has enough texture and enough good ideas to make the viewing worthwhile. It is uneven in the way anthologies almost always are. It is sometimes too brief, sometimes too obvious, sometimes more visually confident than narratively satisfying. But it also understands the appeal of the modern ghost story: the idea that the city is full of tiny curses hiding in plain sight.
A tunnel. A wall. A mirror. A closet. A dental chair. An interview room. A warehouse. A game.
The film takes ordinary places and gives them one bad secret each. That may not be enough to make it unforgettable, but it is enough to make it watchable. And maybe being half-forgotten is part of its strange charm. Urban legends do not always stay clear in the mind. They blur. They change. They come back under different names.
Maybe I watched Urban Myths before. Maybe I only watched something like it. Either way, the ghosts did not seem offended.
Affiliate Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. If you click through and make a purchase, I may earn a small commission—at no additional cost to you. I only recommend products I personally find useful or relevant. Thank you for your support.
Leave a Reply